Patents

A patent can only be obtained for a man-made item.  Viruses are naturally occurring things.  One cannot have a patent on something that nature created.   

So why are there thousands of patents on viruses and specifically corona viruses?   While it is true that there can be legitimate reasons for research on viruses, the number of patents, and who owns them, raises questions about motives.   There is a lot of money to be made in medical technology.   But there are also potential interests in use of viruses as part of unconventional warfare.

Dr. David Martin PhD is, among other things, an expert in research into patents.  His video presentations regarding Covid are nothing if not entertaining, but raise vital questions.   Lumped in with all the rest of the sceptics of the official narrative as a conspiracy theorist, it is hard to argue with the paper trail.  

It is now well known that SARS-COV2 was released from a lab in Wuhan, China, which was funded in part by US dollars approved by Anthony Fauci,  What is not well known but what Dr. Martin reveals is that research into modified corona viruses, the spike protein, the use of corona viruses in the development of vaccines, and specific patents on that research, preceded the outbreak of what we know as COVID-19.  The full text of his summary, "The Fauci/Covid-19 Dossier" can be found here.

According to Martin, "On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans."  (Dossier P 16)   

So specific research into coronaviruses started in 2002, specifically a "replication defective" virus, which is a virus that needs another virus to reproduce.  The general idea, it seems, was to use corona viruses as a means of delivering other elements in vaccine development.  Other researchers have noted Anthony Fauci's interest in using corona viruses as part of an AIDS vaccine.  This research started before the first SARS outbreak.  

A year later, patents were issued on the RNA sequence as well as a testing methodology.  "April 25, 2003 CDC Patent filed and ultimately becomes US7,220,852 (the patent on the RNA sequence) and 7,776,521 (the patent on the testing methodology. These patents give the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services the ability to control the commercial exploitation of SARS coronavirus."  (Dossier p 17)  

You have heard of treatments for Covid using monoclonal anitbodies.   In 2013 "Dana Farber Cancer Institute files U.S. Patent 7,750,123 on a monoclonal antibody to neutralize SARS CoV. This research is supported by several NIH grants including National Institutes of Health Grants A128785, A148436, and A105382".    Years before the current crisis, interest in "neutralizing" the virus was already leading to patents.

The main troublesome element of SARS-COV2 is the infamous "spike protein" that causes inflammation of many organs and clotting of the blood.  In November of 2004, the "University of Hong Kong patents SARS associated spike protein on CoV and pursues patent US 7,491,489"  (Dossier P 18)

Dr. Martin takes note that DARPA, our military Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, got involved with funding of research into coronaviruses in 2005, which we will see created an issue with Moderna patents.  The interest in using corona viruses in the development of vaccines picks up speed.

In 2015, "Moderna signs a vaccine development agreement with NIAID and executes it with the lead on the mRNA-1273 lead developer and inventor Guiseppe Ciaramella."  (Dossier P19)

In 2016, the "NIH through Scripps Institute and Dartmouth College file patent application WO 2018081318A1 'Prefusion Coronavirus Spike Proteins and their Use'"   

Martin makes particular note of a legal requirement to indicate that government financing was involved in pursuit of a patent.  His company M-Cam "and Knowledge Ecology International have independently confirmed that Moderna ...violated U.S. law in failing to disclose the U.S. government’s funding interest in their patents and patent applications. While this negligence impacts all of Moderna’s over 130 granted U.S. patents, it is particularly problematic for U.S. Patent 10,702,600 (‘600) which is the patent relating to, 'a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) comprising an open reading frame encoding a betacoronavirus (BetaCoV) S protein or S protein subunit formulated in a lipid nanoparticle.'  The specific claims addressing the pivot to the SARS Coronavirus were patented on March 28, 2019 – 9 months before the SARS CoV-2 outbreak!"  (Dossier PP 23-24)

While that last sentence is a mouthful, in layman's terms, what is patented is a maniplated bit of genetic material carrying information, mRNA, based on a corona virus, encased in a lipid nanoparticle to preserve it and deliver it into cells.  The patent in question was issued well before the first reported case of Covid-19.

There are huge financial interests in treating this outbreak with mRNA "vaccines" that appear to have been developed at "warp speed", but were seemingly in the works in advance of the need.  There is also the troubling connection to the Chinese Communist Party which has long expressed interest in bioweapon technology.

He is not the first to conclude that the virus was human engineered, and that the mRNA injections contain instructions to manufacture the specific spike protein that causes inflammation and blood clotting at the minimum.  It is, in his view, a bio-weapon.   

And that bio-weapon is being injected into children who have nearly zero chance of being harmed by the original virus.  

Martin lists a half-dozen major felonies committed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, representing massive fraud, which if prosecuted, would invalidate the Emergency Use Authorization and put an end to the mandates.  Why will no one take action?